FREE ACCESS: Galorath’s 2026 State of the Industry Report →

Book a Consultation

AI Built for Estimation

SEERai

  • Build estimates with natural language
  • Documents to WBS in minutes
  • Agent-powered workflows
  • Secure and auditable
Learn More

The Automakers Writing Off Billions All Have One Thing in Common: Bad Estimates

img

$65 billion. That is the collective writedown automakers have absorbed from EV investments built on cost projections that did not survive contact with reality. The estimation failures behind these losses are not unique to automotive. They are a warning for any industry scaling new technology on old assumptions.

The scale of the miss

Ford has written off $19.5 billion. General Motors took $7.6 billion in charges for 2025 alone, with more expected this year. Stellantis recorded a staggering €22.2 billion writedown in the second half of 2025, reflecting what the company described as significantly reduced expectations for EV products. Across the industry, more than $65 billion in financial writedowns now mark what was, just three years ago, a confident race to build EV factories and capture market share.

These are not operational losses from selling cars at a loss. They are asset impairments, meaning the projected value of the investments no longer holds. The cost models that justified billions in capital allocation were built on demand curves, material cost assumptions, and production ramp timelines that proved wrong at nearly every level.

Where the cost models broke

Battery costs remain the dominant variable, accounting for 40%-50% of total EV manufacturing expenses. While pack prices fell to a record $108 per kWh globally, the averages mask severe regional disparities. Packs in North America and Europe run 44% and 56% higher than in China, respectively. Automakers who modeled battery costs using global averages rather than region-specific supply chain realities built estimates on a foundation that was never accurate for their production footprint.

Raw material volatility compounded the problem. Lithium prices have seen an 800% spread over the past decade, while cobalt prices have fluctuated by nearly 300%. A 10% swing in raw material costs typically shifts battery pack prices by 5 to 7%, yet many capital allocation models used static material cost inputs or best-case trajectory curves. Labor cost escalation added another layer: union negotiations are driving 25%-30% increases in manufacturing labor costs, a variable that traditional Excel-based costing models, updated infrequently, consistently underestimate.

The estimation lesson that crosses every industry

The EV writedown story is often framed as a demand forecasting failure or a strategic miscalculation. It is both. But at its core, it is an estimation failure: the inability of static, assumption-heavy cost models to account for the volatility, interdependency, and regional variability inherent in scaling new technology.

The upshot: Any automaker investing in AI infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, energy transition, or digital transformation faces the same structural challenge: the cost models that justify capital allocation must be dynamic, account for second-order effects like labor market competition and supply chain repricing, and be stress-tested against scenarios that the business case would prefer to ignore. $65 billion says the old way of estimating does not work. The question is whether your industry applies learnings from the automakers mistakes, becomes a cautionary tale.

Should Cost Analysis

Learn how Should-Cost Analysis can identify savings opportunities and drive cost efficiency in procurement and manufacturing processes.

Code lines on a screen for cost analysis.

Software Maintenance Cost

Find out why accurate estimation of software maintenance costs is critical to proper project management, and how it can make up to roughly 75% of the TCO.

people working at computers
Add Galorath as a preferred source on Google Add Galorath as a preferred source on Google
Author Image
Charles Orlando Charles Orlando is Chief Strategy Officer at Galorath, where he leads corporate strategy, generative AI innovation, and go-to-market execution. His work centers on architecting AI systems that operate securely in high-stakes environments, with a focus on real-time operational intelligence, platform extensibility, and strategic data integration.

Every project is a journey, and with Galorath by your side, it’s a journey towards assured success. Our expertise becomes your asset, our insights your guiding light. Let’s collaborate to turn your project visions into remarkable realities.

BOOK A CONSULTATION