2026 STATE OF THE INDUSTRY — ENERGY & UTILITIES
Organizations enter 2026 with more data, more tools, and more visibility than ever, yet they struggle to translate that into reliable plans.
One sign-up, free access to the report and all 15 briefs
The full report offers insights and analysis into global cost, schedule, and risk trends, from AI to parametric modeling. 15 segment briefs provide deep dives into a single industry, region, and functions.
2026 REPORT
The Governance Imperative: Cost,
Schedule, and Risk Under Global Uncertainty
SEGMENT EXCERPT
The Energy & Utilities segment comprises 21 respondents, representing 9.5% of the total survey sample. This segment stands apart in its demographic composition: 57.1% of respondents are practitioners (staff closest to estimation work), while 42.9% are leaders. This is the only segment where practitioners form a majority, reflecting the hands-on, technical nature of energy infrastructure estimation. Geographic distribution spans the United Kingdom (7 respondents), the United States (4), and Australia (3), with representation from diverse roles including finance executives (5), program managers (4), and cost/estimation specialists.
Energy is the most supply-chain-constrained segment in the study. Its respondents report the highest rates of supplier delays, the widest adoption of specialized estimation software, and the greatest reliance on external consultants. This profile points to an industry that recognizes the centrality of estimation to project success and is willing to invest in specialized expertise and tooling to manage cost and schedule risk. Unlike software or services verticals, where estimation complexity stems primarily from labor variability, energy projects are bound by the physical realities of capital goods—manufacturing lead times measured in months or years, transportation constraints, regulatory approval cycles, and commodity price volatility.
Table of Contents
1 of 6 unlockedThe Energy & Utilities segment comprises 21 respondents, representing 9.5% of the total survey sample. This segment stands apart in its demographic composition: 57.1% of respondents are practitioners (staff closest to estimation work), while 42.9% are leaders. This is the only segment where practitioners form a majority, reflecting the hands-on, technical nature of energy infrastructure estimation. Geographic distribution spans the United Kingdom (7 respondents), the United States (4), and Australia (3), with representation from diverse roles including finance executives (5), program managers (4), and cost/estimation specialists.
Energy is the most supply-chain-constrained segment in the study. Its respondents report the highest rates of supplier delays, the widest adoption of specialized estimation software, and the greatest reliance on external consultants. This profile points to an industry that recognizes the centrality of estimation to project success and is willing to invest in specialized expertise and tooling to manage cost and schedule risk. Unlike software or services verticals, where estimation complexity stems primarily from labor variability, energy projects are bound by the physical realities of capital goods—manufacturing lead times measured in months or years, transportation constraints, regulatory approval cycles, and commodity price volatility.